People WILL pay for personal training in your market: Start with selling a 3-pt assessment
If you have coached for a while, you probably agree that in a perfect world, when it comes to assessing individual limitations and teaching movement mechanics, one-on-one personal training is the best way to bring on a new client. It’s hard to argue that a person won’t learn better and more effectively with all of the attention on them than they will in a group of 12 inexperienced people all learning to squat for the first time.
But alas, one-on-one training is expensive for the client and time-consuming for the coach. People are leery about paying $75 to $90-plus an hour, hence the trend of group fundamentals, group OnRamps and group bootcamps. And on the coaching end, coaches are terrified to ask someone to pay $800 for 10 personal training sessions.
At my gym, I had no choice. It was sink or swim. Since Day 1, back in 2009, I was paid 100 percent based on commission, and our fundamentals program at Madlab School of Fitness has been predominantly one-on-one personal training since the get-go. As a result, if I didn’t sell someone on personal training, I wasn’t going to get much of a paycheque.
In the old days (2009 to 2013) this meant selling people on 10 to 15 sessions up front, meaning finding people out in the world who were willing to pay between $750 and $1,200 up front before you really even showed them your value as a coach.
Then a few years ago, some of our coaches switched to a 3-personal training session assessment.
This meant a new person paid just $262 for three personal training sessions, essentially to be assessed on how they move—how they hinge, squat, push and pull—and what type of deficiencies they have. From there, the coach gains a better idea of how much more personal training the person will need in order to be adequately prepared for group classes.
At first, I was massively opposed to the 3-pt assessment. Being naturally short-sighted and a little greedy, I always went for the big sale. It meant the person was committed right away to 10 to 15 sessions, and more money in my pocket. I also disliked the idea having to sell the person again and again and again. It seemed easier to get a larger commitment from the first day.
As a result, I resisted the 3-pt assessment for two years.
At the same time, the fitness market had become a lot more competitive in Vancouver. Gone were the days where people showed up and blindly trusted me before dropping $1,000 on training. Now, we live in a world where people let you know they’re going to check out a couple other gyms in the city before making their decision.
I realized that my conversion rate on my intro days had started declining. I found myself losing clients to other gyms. Their reason was usually because of the price of 10 personal training sessions.
Not everyone has been as automatically trusting as these two long-term clients…
So about 6 months ago, I decided to give the 3-pt assessment a try.
To say I have been converted into a 3-pt assessment believer is an understatement. My conversion rate is back to around 90 percent (90 percent of the intro days with prospects I have done in the last six months have been converted into clients), and every single person who has purchased the 3-pt assessment has then gone on to purchase another 3 to 12 sessions up front after completing their first three sessions.
Here’s why I think it works:
1. Reasonable skin in the game:
Generally, it seems someone who isn’t 100 percent sure whether they want to commit $1,200 to training is willing to still “give it a try” via just 3 sessions for $262. This still requires them investing some skin in the game, but it’s a reasonable amount of money. Further, it gives the person a sense of control and power. If the person doesn’t like their experience in the first three sessions, they know they can move along to something else.
2. I do a better job as a coach
I used to be so opposed to only selling three sessions because I didn’t like the idea of being in a position to have to sell myself again and again as a coach. I hated the idea of getting to the end of the third session and then asking them whether they wanted to continue or not.
But I have learned all it has done is force me to be on my A-game and provide the client with the best possible service, so there’s no doubt they will continue on. I essentially know I have failed as a coach if the person chooses not to continue after the 3-pt assessment.
As I said, so far this hasn’t happened. It seems the 3 one-on-one sessions is a perfect amount of time to build trust with the client, and by the end the person is hooked on, and sees the value of paying for personal training.
3. Exposes the value of personal training
It’s one thing to tell a person they need one-on-one training before they can handle classes. It’s another thing entirely for a person to be humbled by what you’re throwing at them and for them to realize on their own that they have a long way to go before they’re self-sufficient and ready for a larger group class.
These three personal training sessions are a perfect way for the person to see for themselves what they need. It’s kind of like the concept of tricking a person into thinking something was their idea. If you tell someone it’s going to cost them $1,000 in personal training before they’ll be ready for a class, the instinct is for them to become suspicious that you’re trying to get their money. But once they experience it for themselves, they always seem to come to terms on their own that they need more one-on-one attention. And at the same time, they usually see and feel emotional and physical gains in just three sessions, which makes them more eager to continue on the personal training path. I have had people come to the end of the three sessions and tell me to bill them for another 10 sessions.